Opinion: The Employment Rights Bill will balance the scales

By UNISON general secretary Christina McAnea
The new Employment Rights Bill is on the way and it can’t come soon enough. It will contain a raft of measures delivering improved rights for individual workers, establishing new collective approaches in long-ignored sectors, and stripping away a decade of hostile restrictions on trade union activity.

Over the last decade, the balance of power at work has been tipped firmly away from workers. Change to laws, regulations and policies has allowed bad bosses to withhold contractual security from people who need varied hours; exploit loopholes and outsourcing to reduce rights and cut pay; and bar trade unions from organising workers and challenging bad practices. 

The measures set out in the bill won’t appear out of nowhere. Every provision is the result of years of campaigning and lobbying and – over the last year – lots of close work with allies in the Labour Party, the TUC and the wider labour movement.

This includes the learning and expertise gathered from the individual cases UNISON has taken on and won on your behalf, the collective negotiations we’ve conducted and the representations we’ve made to employers across the UK. These enabled us to secure pre-election policy pledges on priority issues, which were firmed into commitments in the King’s Speech in July and will be embedded in the bill this October.

What we expect from the bill

The scope and timetable of the bill are hugely ambitious.

It will introduce new employment rights in England, Scotland and Wales (Northern Ireland applies different employment laws) including on flexible and family-friendly working to prevent people making the tough choice to leave secure jobs to get the hours they need.

Changes will be proposed to stamp out the use of exploitative zero-hours and fire and rehire practices to bar workers from rights and security. A ‘two-tier’ code will be introduced so outsourcers can’t profit from worsening the pay and terms of workers. New routes for quick resolution of common breaches will be proposed, meaning workers won’t have to initiate long tribunal battles to get employers to do the right thing. A more powerful enforcement body will be tasked with tackling bad practices.

We expect that the bill will allow more people to benefit from consistent improvements to pay and terms that UNISON negotiates. Outsourced workers, school support staff and adult social care workers should be specifically referenced, taking the much-campaigned-for first step towards establishing a national care service in England.

For further details on what the bill includes, see our legal briefing.

How UNISON will engage

Of course, as always, the devil will be in the detail. We are preparing for our parliamentary, legal and technical experts to get involved in every step of the bill’s journey, engaging with the small print of each of the provisions, and undertaking the vast array of meetings, conversations, events and submissions needed to see the bill onto statute books (including adapting to fit or work with devolved powers) and adopted in employment policies and contracts.

However, what will bring this bill to life is your stories about the difference the changes could make for you. We’ll make sure your voice is heard, so look out for updates and details of how to get involved as this work unfolds. We will be working directly with some key groups, like care workers and school staff on the details as the legislation goes through.

The bill’s introduction will be only the start of the parliamentary process. As it makes its way through the difference stages to become law, many measures will attract tough opposition. UNISON will need to work with our allies to make sure what’s published is not neutralised or struck out by those with vested interests trying to push back on workers rights.

Trade union rights

We know that trade union rights will be a key battleground. We want to see progressive change here, including the removal of legal restrictions that prevent trade unions from offering membership to workers.

We also want to see the government lift the legal barriers to organising strike action, which will enable unions to use modern methods to make decisions, like running e-ballots for key votes.

I have no doubt these measures will be cheaply characterised and derided by our opponents, but they could hold the key to re-balancing industrial relations that have been all one-way for far too long.

When employers know strikes are possible, they work harder to avoid them – talking to workers, listening to unions and creating the kind of engaged workplaces needed to boost morale and success across the whole economy.

I’ve spent the last 15 years speaking out against Westminster-sanctioned worker exploitation, trade union restrictions and employer penny-pinching, calling out the damage caused to our vital public services.

UNISON will not miss this opportunity to speak up for a progressive agenda and show that what’s good for workers is also good for the services they deliver.

Expectations are high and we will be working with our trade union allies to make them a reality.

The article Opinion: The Employment Rights Bill will balance the scales first appeared on the UNISON National site.

Opinion: The Employment Rights Bill will balance the scales

By UNISON general secretary Christina McAnea
The new Employment Rights Bill is on the way and it can’t come soon enough. It will contain a raft of measures delivering improved rights for individual workers, establishing new collective approaches in long-ignored sectors, and stripping away a decade of hostile restrictions on trade union activity.

Over the last decade, the balance of power at work has been tipped firmly away from workers. Change to laws, regulations and policies has allowed bad bosses to withhold contractual security from people who need varied hours; exploit loopholes and outsourcing to reduce rights and cut pay; and bar trade unions from organising workers and challenging bad practices. 

The measures set out in the bill won’t appear out of nowhere. Every provision is the result of years of campaigning and lobbying and – over the last year – lots of close work with allies in the Labour Party, the TUC and the wider labour movement.

This includes the learning and expertise gathered from the individual cases UNISON has taken on and won on your behalf, the collective negotiations we’ve conducted and the representations we’ve made to employers across the UK. These enabled us to secure pre-election policy pledges on priority issues, which were firmed into commitments in the King’s Speech in July and will be embedded in the bill this October.

What we expect from the bill

The scope and timetable of the bill are hugely ambitious.

It will introduce new employment rights in England, Scotland and Wales (Northern Ireland applies different employment laws) including on flexible and family-friendly working to prevent people making the tough choice to leave secure jobs to get the hours they need.

Changes will be proposed to stamp out the use of exploitative zero-hours and fire and rehire practices to bar workers from rights and security. A ‘two-tier’ code will be introduced so outsourcers can’t profit from worsening the pay and terms of workers. New routes for quick resolution of common breaches will be proposed, meaning workers won’t have to initiate long tribunal battles to get employers to do the right thing. A more powerful enforcement body will be tasked with tackling bad practices.

We expect that the bill will allow more people to benefit from consistent improvements to pay and terms that UNISON negotiates. Outsourced workers, school support staff and adult social care workers should be specifically referenced, taking the much-campaigned-for first step towards establishing a national care service in England.

For further details on what the bill includes, see our legal briefing.

How UNISON will engage

Of course, as always, the devil will be in the detail. We are preparing for our parliamentary, legal and technical experts to get involved in every step of the bill’s journey, engaging with the small print of each of the provisions, and undertaking the vast array of meetings, conversations, events and submissions needed to see the bill onto statute books (including adapting to fit or work with devolved powers) and adopted in employment policies and contracts.

However, what will bring this bill to life is your stories about the difference the changes could make for you. We’ll make sure your voice is heard, so look out for updates and details of how to get involved as this work unfolds. We will be working directly with some key groups, like care workers and school staff on the details as the legislation goes through.

The bill’s introduction will be only the start of the parliamentary process. As it makes its way through the difference stages to become law, many measures will attract tough opposition. UNISON will need to work with our allies to make sure what’s published is not neutralised or struck out by those with vested interests trying to push back on workers rights.

Trade union rights

We know that trade union rights will be a key battleground. We want to see progressive change here, including the removal of legal restrictions that prevent trade unions from offering membership to workers.

We also want to see the government lift the legal barriers to organising strike action, which will enable unions to use modern methods to make decisions, like running e-ballots for key votes.

I have no doubt these measures will be cheaply characterised and derided by our opponents, but they could hold the key to re-balancing industrial relations that have been all one-way for far too long.

When employers know strikes are possible, they work harder to avoid them – talking to workers, listening to unions and creating the kind of engaged workplaces needed to boost morale and success across the whole economy.

I’ve spent the last 15 years speaking out against Westminster-sanctioned worker exploitation, trade union restrictions and employer penny-pinching, calling out the damage caused to our vital public services.

UNISON will not miss this opportunity to speak up for a progressive agenda and show that what’s good for workers is also good for the services they deliver.

Expectations are high and we will be working with our trade union allies to make them a reality.

The article Opinion: The Employment Rights Bill will balance the scales first appeared on the UNISON National site.

Opinion: Why you should vote ‘yes’ to strike in councils and schools

By Mike Short, UNISON head of local government

UNISON is asking its council and school members in England and Wales, and council members in Northern Ireland, to vote to go out on strike over the local government employers’ pay offer for 2024.

The industrial action ballot is open now. You should have already received your ballots in the post and it runs until Wednesday 16 October.

As UNISON’s head of local government, I wanted to take a moment to explain why your elected representatives on the committee believe the time is right to vote ‘yes’ for strike action.

The joint unions’ claim and the employers’ offer

In February this year, the joint NJC unions submitted a pay claim for an increase of £3,000 or 10%, whichever was greater.

This claim was based on detailed research into the state of council and school pay. It compared council and school pay against public and private sector counterparts and it paid particular attention to the impact of a decade or more of below-inflation pay increases that council and school workers have suffered since 2010.

It accepted the fact that addressing council and school pay erosion since 2010, which has taken an average of 25% from the value of pay, would take more than a year due to the financial difficulties which councils and schools face.

But it also acknowledged that there are critical issues in the sector around vacancies, workloads and in-work poverty, which must be addressed immediately through pay. So, it proposed a reasonable starting point to both tackle the immediate issues and take the first step in addressing historic pay erosion.

In May, the employers responded with an offer of £1,290. This represents pay increases ranging from 5.8% for those on the lowest pay point to 2.5% for those on the highest.

In June and July, UNISON consulted members on the employer’s offer, and it was overwhelmingly rejected. This gave UNISON and the NJC committee a clear mandate to ballot members for industrial action and to recommend members vote yes for strike action.

Why should you vote yes for industrial action?

Since that consultation, we have seen a new Labour government take power in Westminster that recognises that public sector workers need adequate pay rises.

After taking power, the new chancellor, Rachel Reeves, announced that this government would accept the recommendations of the public sector pay review bodies in full.

Council and school pay is negotiated directly with the local government employers and, as such, the government’s decision doesn’t necessarily apply to councils and schools. It is up to the employers to improve their offer – though we need the government to do their part by funding it.

After years of bearing the worst of public sector pay squeezes, local government cannot be left behind, once again.

With councils across the country nearing ‘bankruptcy’, how can they afford this?

Over the last 14 years, council budgets have been squeezed to breaking point by a lack of funding from central government. On already skeleton-thin budgets there is predicted to be a £4bn funding gap this year alone for councils in England, Wales and Scotland.

UNISON is sympathetic to the state of public finances which the new government has inherited and they’ve been left a particularly unenviable task to sort out council and school funding.

But the new government must step up and let councils take back control of their finances through higher and longer-term funding settlements. And in the short term they must enable the employers to offer staff a much needed, adequate pay rise.

Voting yes for strike action in this ballot will show your strength of feeling, to the employers and to the government, about your pay. It will demonstrate unequivocally that the time has come for government to step in and address the issues in local government head on.

The article Opinion: Why you should vote ‘yes’ to strike in councils and schools first appeared on the UNISON National site.

Opinion: Why you should vote ‘yes’ to strike in councils and schools

By Mike Short, UNISON head of local government

UNISON is asking its council and school members in England and Wales, and council members in Northern Ireland, to vote to go out on strike over the local government employers’ pay offer for 2024.

The industrial action ballot is open now. You should have already received your ballots in the post and it runs until Wednesday 16 October.

As UNISON’s head of local government, I wanted to take a moment to explain why your elected representatives on the committee believe the time is right to vote ‘yes’ for strike action.

The joint unions’ claim and the employers’ offer

In February this year, the joint NJC unions submitted a pay claim for an increase of £3,000 or 10%, whichever was greater.

This claim was based on detailed research into the state of council and school pay. It compared council and school pay against public and private sector counterparts and it paid particular attention to the impact of a decade or more of below-inflation pay increases that council and school workers have suffered since 2010.

It accepted the fact that addressing council and school pay erosion since 2010, which has taken an average of 25% from the value of pay, would take more than a year due to the financial difficulties which councils and schools face.

But it also acknowledged that there are critical issues in the sector around vacancies, workloads and in-work poverty, which must be addressed immediately through pay. So, it proposed a reasonable starting point to both tackle the immediate issues and take the first step in addressing historic pay erosion.

In May, the employers responded with an offer of £1,290. This represents pay increases ranging from 5.8% for those on the lowest pay point to 2.5% for those on the highest.

In June and July, UNISON consulted members on the employer’s offer, and it was overwhelmingly rejected. This gave UNISON and the NJC committee a clear mandate to ballot members for industrial action and to recommend members vote yes for strike action.

Why should you vote yes for industrial action?

Since that consultation, we have seen a new Labour government take power in Westminster that recognises that public sector workers need adequate pay rises.

After taking power, the new chancellor, Rachel Reeves, announced that this government would accept the recommendations of the public sector pay review bodies in full.

Council and school pay is negotiated directly with the local government employers and, as such, the government’s decision doesn’t necessarily apply to councils and schools. It is up to the employers to improve their offer – though we need the government to do their part by funding it.

After years of bearing the worst of public sector pay squeezes, local government cannot be left behind, once again.

With councils across the country nearing ‘bankruptcy’, how can they afford this?

Over the last 14 years, council budgets have been squeezed to breaking point by a lack of funding from central government. On already skeleton-thin budgets there is predicted to be a £4bn funding gap this year alone for councils in England, Wales and Scotland.

UNISON is sympathetic to the state of public finances which the new government has inherited and they’ve been left a particularly unenviable task to sort out council and school funding.

But the new government must step up and let councils take back control of their finances through higher and longer-term funding settlements. And in the short term they must enable the employers to offer staff a much needed, adequate pay rise.

Voting yes for strike action in this ballot will show your strength of feeling, to the employers and to the government, about your pay. It will demonstrate unequivocally that the time has come for government to step in and address the issues in local government head on.

The article Opinion: Why you should vote ‘yes’ to strike in councils and schools first appeared on the UNISON National site.

NEC told: ‘If you don’t vote Labour, you’re giving a vote to the Tories’

In her report to UNISON’s national executive council meeting today, general secretary Christina McAnea thanked those who helped campaigning for the local elections earlier in May.

And speaking less than 24 hours after Rishi Sunak called a general election she noted that, in England and Wales on 4 July, “if you don’t vote Labour, you’re giving a vote to the Tories. We want to see as many Labour MPs returned as possible”.

“We have seen, as trade unionists, the result of 14 years of the Tories,” she said, adding that the Conservative government is taking “the British people for fools”, after the prime minister had claimed falling inflation as a victory for Conservative policy, ignoring the fact that that doesn’t mean that prices are not still rising.

“The cost of living is still the main issue” on doorsteps, said Ms McAnea and reiterated that “the choice is between Labour and the Tories”.

Addressing concerns around stories that Labour was back-peddling on the New Deal for Working People, she said that discussions were taking place “almost weekly” between unions and the party and that that was not the case.

Ms McAnea noted that this was down to Conservative-supporting media spinning stories about the New Deal just before the 2 May elections.

On the Middle East, the general secretary also told the meeting that UNISON was in discussion with international unions to support the people of Gaza and trade unions in Palestine.

“I recently met with Husam Zomlot, Palestinian ambassador to the UK,” she said. “I assured him of UNISON’s ongoing support for justice for Palestinians and for peace in the region, as well as the fundraising efforts of our branches to get aid to the people of Gaza.”

The council also received a report from the president, Libby Nolan, which included her attendance at regional AGMs, including that in the North West, where she told members that action in the region taken by branches as part of the union’s Pay Fair for Patient Care campaign “has been successful and has helped to galvanise activity in many other parts of the country”.

Ms Nolan said that she was continuing to “represent UNISON at the national demonstrations organised by PSC (Palestine Solidarity Campaign).

She noted that last Saturday’s demonstration was on the week of the 76th anniversary of the Nakba – the mass displacement and dispossession of Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

“It was a great honour to speak on the 76th anniversary to commemorate the devastating events of the Nakba and demand an end to all the atrocities of the last seven months.”

The meeting also heard about and discussed:

  • arrangements for national delegate conference in Brighton in June
  • arrangements for the political fund ballot
  • increases in membership, together with improving retention of members.

Check the website and Activist digital over the next six weeks for more guidance over the general election.

The article NEC told: ‘If you don’t vote Labour, you’re giving a vote to the Tories’ first appeared on the UNISON National site.

NEC told: ‘If you don’t vote Labour, you’re giving a vote to the Tories’

In her report to UNISON’s national executive council meeting today, general secretary Christina McAnea thanked those who helped campaigning for the local elections earlier in May.

And speaking less than 24 hours after Rishi Sunak called a general election she noted that, in England and Wales on 4 July, “if you don’t vote Labour, you’re giving a vote to the Tories. We want to see as many Labour MPs returned as possible”.

“We have seen, as trade unionists, the result of 14 years of the Tories,” she said, adding that the Conservative government is taking “the British people for fools”, after the prime minister had claimed falling inflation as a victory for Conservative policy, ignoring the fact that that doesn’t mean that prices are not still rising.

“The cost of living is still the main issue” on doorsteps, said Ms McAnea and reiterated that “the choice is between Labour and the Tories”.

Addressing concerns around stories that Labour was back-peddling on the New Deal for Working People, she said that discussions were taking place “almost weekly” between unions and the party and that that was not the case.

Ms McAnea noted that this was down to Conservative-supporting media spinning stories about the New Deal just before the 2 May elections.

On the Middle East, the general secretary also told the meeting that UNISON was in discussion with international unions to support the people of Gaza and trade unions in Palestine.

“I recently met with Husam Zomlot, Palestinian ambassador to the UK,” she said. “I assured him of UNISON’s ongoing support for justice for Palestinians and for peace in the region, as well as the fundraising efforts of our branches to get aid to the people of Gaza.”

The council also received a report from the president, Libby Nolan, which included her attendance at regional AGMs, including that in the North West, where she told members that action in the region taken by branches as part of the union’s Pay Fair for Patient Care campaign “has been successful and has helped to galvanise activity in many other parts of the country”.

Ms Nolan said that she was continuing to “represent UNISON at the national demonstrations organised by PSC (Palestine Solidarity Campaign).

She noted that last Saturday’s demonstration was on the week of the 76th anniversary of the Nakba – the mass displacement and dispossession of Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

“It was a great honour to speak on the 76th anniversary to commemorate the devastating events of the Nakba and demand an end to all the atrocities of the last seven months.”

The meeting also heard about and discussed:

  • arrangements for national delegate conference in Brighton in June
  • arrangements for the political fund ballot
  • increases in membership, together with improving retention of members.

Check the website and Activist digital over the next six weeks for more guidance over the general election.

The article NEC told: ‘If you don’t vote Labour, you’re giving a vote to the Tories’ first appeared on the UNISON National site.

Opinion: The water industry is a national scandal

By UNISON’s head of environment, Donna Rowe-Merriman

The current ownership and operating model for the water industry in England is in the news almost every day – and almost always for the wrong reasons.

Privatisation of the water industry has failed. Disastrously. It was a Tory government gamble that has not paid off – unless you are a water company chief executive or shareholder.

Consumers have not seen better outcomes. In fact, we are seeing profits being extracted for shareholders and some water companies being laden with debt despite significant under-investment on infrastructure.

Companies have proven themselves inadequate – with their actions resulting in higher bills, lower standards and increasing harm to the natural environment and public health.

This model has resulted in the prioritising of profit ahead of investment, and the incurring of unsustainable levels of debt to support it, with negative consequences for the public and customers being the inevitable result.

Since privatisation, consumers have paid billions for services. Despite this, our environment is at breaking point and there is no real desire from this government to turn the tide and force companies to deliver much needed infrastructure investment.

It was recently revealed that 2023 saw a huge increase in sewage spills into waterways in England, from 301,091 spills in 2022 to 464,056 in 2023 – an increase of over 54% in a single year, making it the worst year for sewage spills on record.

Recent media reports have also confirmed that the nine water companies in England discharged sewage into rivers close to their own headquarters for more than 56,000 hours in 2023, further underscoring these failings.

This affects UK wildlife and millions of people that use rivers and coastlines for recreation, from anglers to surfers. Growing campaigns highlight not only broken pipes – but a fundamentally broken system.

In addition, the current major drinking water contamination incident in Devon, and the admission by bosses at South West Water of the inadequacy of the company’s response, have demonstrated how even confidence in the safety of drinking water in homes has been affected by the failings of water companies in England.

Yet instead of investment and improvements to infrastructure, companies in the water sector – which were debt-free at the time of privatisation – have since taken on over £60 billion of debt, while at the same time investors have withdrawn £85 billion in shareholder dividends and other payments.

Water company bosses have also reportedly received over £25m in bonuses and incentives since 2019, according to analysis.

The only solution to this crisis

At the same time, companies including Southern Water and Thames Water are reporting significant financial problems, with the owners of Thames Water insisting on significant increases to customer bills and a write-off of fines before it agrees to financially shore-up the company.

The result of this is failing water infrastructure, increasing sewage spillages, reduced public confidence in the safety drinking water, coupled with excessive shareholder rewards and an increasingly precarious financial situation for water companies themselves.

This demonstrates that the current model of ownership and operation is not fit for purpose, and UNISON’s longstanding position in calling for a renationalised water sector, which is publicly owned and properly publicly accountable instead of beholden to shareholders, is the solution to the shortcomings of the failed private model of ownership.

Water companies have been profiteering from privatisation for decades to the tune of tens of billions extracted for shareholders at the expense of customers and the environment.

These companies are leaving everyone with decades worth of problems for future generations – whether it is our environment, our wildlife, or our public health.

This is a national scandal of epic proportions on a public right for clean water from our taps and clean rivers and coastline for our communities.

The only real option is to bring these failing water companies back under public oversight, is publicly accountable and above all publicly owned.

The article Opinion: The water industry is a national scandal first appeared on the UNISON National site.

Opinion: The water industry is a national scandal

By UNISON’s head of environment, Donna Rowe-Merriman

The current ownership and operating model for the water industry in England is in the news almost every day – and almost always for the wrong reasons.

Privatisation of the water industry has failed. Disastrously. It was a Tory government gamble that has not paid off – unless you are a water company chief executive or shareholder.

Consumers have not seen better outcomes. In fact, we are seeing profits being extracted for shareholders and some water companies being laden with debt despite significant under-investment on infrastructure.

Companies have proven themselves inadequate – with their actions resulting in higher bills, lower standards and increasing harm to the natural environment and public health.

This model has resulted in the prioritising of profit ahead of investment, and the incurring of unsustainable levels of debt to support it, with negative consequences for the public and customers being the inevitable result.

Since privatisation, consumers have paid billions for services. Despite this, our environment is at breaking point and there is no real desire from this government to turn the tide and force companies to deliver much needed infrastructure investment.

It was recently revealed that 2023 saw a huge increase in sewage spills into waterways in England, from 301,091 spills in 2022 to 464,056 in 2023 – an increase of over 54% in a single year, making it the worst year for sewage spills on record.

Recent media reports have also confirmed that the nine water companies in England discharged sewage into rivers close to their own headquarters for more than 56,000 hours in 2023, further underscoring these failings.

This affects UK wildlife and millions of people that use rivers and coastlines for recreation, from anglers to surfers. Growing campaigns highlight not only broken pipes – but a fundamentally broken system.

In addition, the current major drinking water contamination incident in Devon, and the admission by bosses at South West Water of the inadequacy of the company’s response, have demonstrated how even confidence in the safety of drinking water in homes has been affected by the failings of water companies in England.

Yet instead of investment and improvements to infrastructure, companies in the water sector – which were debt-free at the time of privatisation – have since taken on over £60 billion of debt, while at the same time investors have withdrawn £85 billion in shareholder dividends and other payments.

Water company bosses have also reportedly received over £25m in bonuses and incentives since 2019, according to analysis.

The only solution to this crisis

At the same time, companies including Southern Water and Thames Water are reporting significant financial problems, with the owners of Thames Water insisting on significant increases to customer bills and a write-off of fines before it agrees to financially shore-up the company.

The result of this is failing water infrastructure, increasing sewage spillages, reduced public confidence in the safety drinking water, coupled with excessive shareholder rewards and an increasingly precarious financial situation for water companies themselves.

This demonstrates that the current model of ownership and operation is not fit for purpose, and UNISON’s longstanding position in calling for a renationalised water sector, which is publicly owned and properly publicly accountable instead of beholden to shareholders, is the solution to the shortcomings of the failed private model of ownership.

Water companies have been profiteering from privatisation for decades to the tune of tens of billions extracted for shareholders at the expense of customers and the environment.

These companies are leaving everyone with decades worth of problems for future generations – whether it is our environment, our wildlife, or our public health.

This is a national scandal of epic proportions on a public right for clean water from our taps and clean rivers and coastline for our communities.

The only real option is to bring these failing water companies back under public oversight, is publicly accountable and above all publicly owned.

The article Opinion: The water industry is a national scandal first appeared on the UNISON National site.

Opinion: Thames Water makes case for renationalisation … now!

By UNISON’s head of environment, Donna Rowe-Merriman

Shadowy overseas private equity firms have sucked all the good out of Thames Water and saddled it with billions of pounds of debt. So reports that it is scrambling to find extra cash, after handing out millions of pounds to shareholders and bonuses to top bosses in recent years, are hardly surprising.

Even its shareholders won’t keep it afloat, having refused to pay £500m by the end of the month, saying regulatory requirements make its business plan “uninvestable”, and insisting that bills must go up – company boss Chris Weston told the BBC today that they need to rise by 40%.

It’s clear that the business model for Thames Water has failed and the company is unviable.

The company is privately owned by a mix of people and businesses. The consortium of pension funds and sovereign wealth funds owns the entire business. The largest shareholder, as of July 2023, is the Canadian pension fund Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (Omers) with approximately 32%.

Mr Weston also stated that it was “business as usual” at the company. The business appears to be lurching from one crisis to another, leaving staff with an uncertain future and customers facing ever more massive bills.

In the 21st century, the issue of water pollution is a national disgrace. The government and regulator have failed to stop water companies to pollute our rivers, canals and coastline.

Saturday’s Boat Race organisers have issued new safety guidance for the races, warning rowers not to enter the water and to cover any open wounds, after high levels of E.coli bacteria were found on the River Thames course.

Provision of water should never have been privatised, allowing millions to be taken out of the industry to line the pockets of shareholders and company executives, while infrastructure was allowed to crumble.

The government must intervene and take control of a business and renationalise Thames Water and now.

The article Opinion: Thames Water makes case for renationalisation … now! first appeared on the UNISON National site.

Opinion: Thames Water makes case for renationalisation … now!

By UNISON’s head of environment, Donna Rowe-Merriman

Shadowy overseas private equity firms have sucked all the good out of Thames Water and saddled it with billions of pounds of debt. So reports that it is scrambling to find extra cash, after handing out millions of pounds to shareholders and bonuses to top bosses in recent years, are hardly surprising.

Even its shareholders won’t keep it afloat, having refused to pay £500m by the end of the month, saying regulatory requirements make its business plan “uninvestable”, and insisting that bills must go up – company boss Chris Weston told the BBC today that they need to rise by 40%.

It’s clear that the business model for Thames Water has failed and the company is unviable.

The company is privately owned by a mix of people and businesses. The consortium of pension funds and sovereign wealth funds owns the entire business. The largest shareholder, as of July 2023, is the Canadian pension fund Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (Omers) with approximately 32%.

Mr Weston also stated that it was “business as usual” at the company. The business appears to be lurching from one crisis to another, leaving staff with an uncertain future and customers facing ever more massive bills.

In the 21st century, the issue of water pollution is a national disgrace. The government and regulator have failed to stop water companies to pollute our rivers, canals and coastline.

Saturday’s Boat Race organisers have issued new safety guidance for the races, warning rowers not to enter the water and to cover any open wounds, after high levels of E.coli bacteria were found on the River Thames course.

Provision of water should never have been privatised, allowing millions to be taken out of the industry to line the pockets of shareholders and company executives, while infrastructure was allowed to crumble.

The government must intervene and take control of a business and renationalise Thames Water and now.

The article Opinion: Thames Water makes case for renationalisation … now! first appeared on the UNISON National site.