WET conference: Invest to protect our environment

Image: Steve Forrest/Workers’ photos

A key theme at Sunday’s water, environment and transport (WET) conference in Brighton was a lack of investment in the country’s environment.

Opening business was a motion discussing the Canal and River Trust funding. It noted that, in July 2023, the government announced a reduced grant to the trust from 2027. This funding reduction is equivalent to £300 million in real terms and, in Canal and River Trust’s own words, “will threaten the future of the nation’s historic canals”.

Speaking on the motion, David Dunwell of the West Yorkshire Combined Authority and Transport said that “currently, 40% of the trust’s income is spent on maintenance of the canal systems infrastructure”, adding that reduction in the funding will inevitably lead to the closure of canals.

Image: Steve Forrest/Workers’ photos

Environment agency

The consequences of cuts were also discussed in relation to the work of the Environment Agency (EA). One motion argued that the best way to protect the environment is retaining the EA and funding it properly.

The motion noted that the recent high-profile media coverage on sewage discharges to rivers and seas has brought intense scrutiny on the agency. It argued that the lack of funding has a direct impact on the ability of the agency to enforce on these issues.

It took aim at the Conservative government’s claim to be the ‘greenest government’ ever, calling it greenwashing and arguing that the problem is chronic underfunding and a political culture in hoc to polluting companies that put profit before the environment.

One speaker said that “it is an unashamed case for protecting the environment agency in its current guise”, adding that the skills and competences required to tackle environmental challenges are best served in an efficient and empowered Environment Agency.

Image: Steve Forrest/Workers’ photos

Transport

Continuing a theme from earlier in the conference around the failure of privatisation of public services, a motion was discussed around bus services and the reduction in passenger levels post-Covid.

Pam Sian (pictured above), chair of the passenger transport forum, noted that, in the “year ending March 2023 (according to government statistics), there were 3.4bn bus passenger journeys, with over half in London”.

Conference condemned the ever-increasing amount of disappearing bus services in communities and the consequent impact on UNISON members employed in the public transport industry.

Ms Sian said: “Private companies want subsidies from the public to cover unprofitable routes – conference these are the same political choices that have left us with tap water you cannot drink and rising energy prices”.

She added that, outside of the capital, the largest user of buses outside of London are low-paid and vulnerable people.

Moving on to solutions to the problem, she heralded the work of the metro mayors in the North West and West Yorkshire taking transport back in-house and argued that the country should be “taking public transport back into the public interest, rather than the interests of profit”.

The motion called on the service group executive to raise awareness, to ask branches and regions to lobby local MPs in protecting bus services and jobs in the sector, and to support the Save Our Buses campaign.

The article WET conference: Invest to protect our environment first appeared on the UNISON National site.

WET conference: Invest to protect our environment

Image: Steve Forrest/Workers’ photos

A key theme at Sunday’s water, environment and transport (WET) conference in Brighton was a lack of investment in the country’s environment.

Opening business was a motion discussing the Canal and River Trust funding. It noted that, in July 2023, the government announced a reduced grant to the trust from 2027. This funding reduction is equivalent to £300 million in real terms and, in Canal and River Trust’s own words, “will threaten the future of the nation’s historic canals”.

Speaking on the motion, David Dunwell of the West Yorkshire Combined Authority and Transport said that “currently, 40% of the trust’s income is spent on maintenance of the canal systems infrastructure”, adding that reduction in the funding will inevitably lead to the closure of canals.

Image: Steve Forrest/Workers’ photos

Environment agency

The consequences of cuts were also discussed in relation to the work of the Environment Agency (EA). One motion argued that the best way to protect the environment is retaining the EA and funding it properly.

The motion noted that the recent high-profile media coverage on sewage discharges to rivers and seas has brought intense scrutiny on the agency. It argued that the lack of funding has a direct impact on the ability of the agency to enforce on these issues.

It took aim at the Conservative government’s claim to be the ‘greenest government’ ever, calling it greenwashing and arguing that the problem is chronic underfunding and a political culture in hoc to polluting companies that put profit before the environment.

One speaker said that “it is an unashamed case for protecting the environment agency in its current guise”, adding that the skills and competences required to tackle environmental challenges are best served in an efficient and empowered Environment Agency.

Image: Steve Forrest/Workers’ photos

Transport

Continuing a theme from earlier in the conference around the failure of privatisation of public services, a motion was discussed around bus services and the reduction in passenger levels post-Covid.

Pam Sian (pictured above), chair of the passenger transport forum, noted that, in the “year ending March 2023 (according to government statistics), there were 3.4bn bus passenger journeys, with over half in London”.

Conference condemned the ever-increasing amount of disappearing bus services in communities and the consequent impact on UNISON members employed in the public transport industry.

Ms Sian said: “Private companies want subsidies from the public to cover unprofitable routes – conference these are the same political choices that have left us with tap water you cannot drink and rising energy prices”.

She added that, outside of the capital, the largest user of buses outside of London are low-paid and vulnerable people.

Moving on to solutions to the problem, she heralded the work of the metro mayors in the North West and West Yorkshire taking transport back in-house and argued that the country should be “taking public transport back into the public interest, rather than the interests of profit”.

The motion called on the service group executive to raise awareness, to ask branches and regions to lobby local MPs in protecting bus services and jobs in the sector, and to support the Save Our Buses campaign.

The article WET conference: Invest to protect our environment first appeared on the UNISON National site.

WET conference examines failure of privatisation

Image: Steve Forrest

UNISON’s water, environment and transport conference, held in Brighton on Sunday, was dominated by an examination of the failures of privatisation in the water industry.

The conference came during renewed media scrutiny of water companies after a new report came to light highlighting thousands of instances of sewage being discharged into waterways in dry weather in 2022, in “illegal spills”.

One motion took aim at this situation calling the current prohibitions against the illegal dumping of sewage into rivers “woefully inadequate”. It highlighted that, even with historic levels of sewage discharge, company bosses are pocketing millions in bonuses while wanting to increase bills by an extra £156 a year.

Image: Steve Forrest

Speaking in the debate, Natalie Mladenovich-Haigh (pictured above), chair of UNISON’s water industry sector committee, noted that “Sewage spills and illegal discharges into England’s waterways have doubled in the past year”.

She went on to highlight that this represented not only a disaster for the environment, but also for water staff and “our members within the sector who are facing an increase in attacks, both verbally and physically, from members of the public who are angry with the increase in both bills and sewage discharge”.

Another speaker from Yorkshire Water said: “We’re told now ­– don’t wear any ID outside of work. I ‘no longer work in Yorkshire Water’, ‘I work in IT’.”

The motion called on the SGE to monitor the impact of public abuse on employees, to lobby government to cease and reverse cuts made to the Environment Agency, and to work with Labour Link to positively campaign on finding a lasting solution to raw sewage discharges.

Image: Steve Forrest

Outside of main conference business, delegates also heard from Cat Hobbs, director of We Own It, in the key-note speech and in a fringe alongside authors of UNISON’s new report Clean Water, a case for public ownership, which was released the same day.

In her speech, Ms Hobbs noted that public ownership is a popular concept among the public, particularly in regard to water.

She highlighted the failures over 30 years of the England’s privatised water system, arguing that it has led to inadequate regulation due to a “revolving door” culture between companies and the regulator Ofwat.

Furthermore, she noted the stark difference in levels of investment, with Scotland seeing 35% more investment into their water infrastructure through its public water company compared to the English privately owned companies – equating to £72 per household more investment.

Image: Steve Forrest

At the fringe, authors of Clean Water, David Hall (pictured above) and Emanuele Lobina gave a detailed overview of the report from the historical context of privatisation of water in England through to its consequences and its solutions.

Mr Hall guided delegates through the research, comparing the UK’s performance against other countries whose water provision is publicly owned. He concluded that “the total contribution of the private owners of these companies over the years is to take out £85bn”, and citing the extraordinary figure that the dividends paid out by the companies are “equivalent to 69% of their pay bill on average.”

Mr Lobina then followed up by explaining the consequences for users, noting that that around 30% of households in the UK are in ‘water poverty’ which is where households spend more than 3% of their total expenditure on water.

He finished by examining ways in which the sector and government could solve the issues, chief among them was moving water back into public ownership.

The article WET conference examines failure of privatisation first appeared on the UNISON National site.

WET conference examines failure of privatisation

Image: Steve Forrest

UNISON’s water, environment and transport conference, held in Brighton on Sunday, was dominated by an examination of the failures of privatisation in the water industry.

The conference came during renewed media scrutiny of water companies after a new report came to light highlighting thousands of instances of sewage being discharged into waterways in dry weather in 2022, in “illegal spills”.

One motion took aim at this situation calling the current prohibitions against the illegal dumping of sewage into rivers “woefully inadequate”. It highlighted that, even with historic levels of sewage discharge, company bosses are pocketing millions in bonuses while wanting to increase bills by an extra £156 a year.

Image: Steve Forrest

Speaking in the debate, Natalie Mladenovich-Haigh (pictured above), chair of UNISON’s water industry sector committee, noted that “Sewage spills and illegal discharges into England’s waterways have doubled in the past year”.

She went on to highlight that this represented not only a disaster for the environment, but also for water staff and “our members within the sector who are facing an increase in attacks, both verbally and physically, from members of the public who are angry with the increase in both bills and sewage discharge”.

Another speaker from Yorkshire Water said: “We’re told now ­– don’t wear any ID outside of work. I ‘no longer work in Yorkshire Water’, ‘I work in IT’.”

The motion called on the SGE to monitor the impact of public abuse on employees, to lobby government to cease and reverse cuts made to the Environment Agency, and to work with Labour Link to positively campaign on finding a lasting solution to raw sewage discharges.

Image: Steve Forrest

Outside of main conference business, delegates also heard from Cat Hobbs, director of We Own It, in the key-note speech and in a fringe alongside authors of UNISON’s new report Clean Water, a case for public ownership, which was released the same day.

In her speech, Ms Hobbs noted that public ownership is a popular concept among the public, particularly in regard to water.

She highlighted the failures over 30 years of the England’s privatised water system, arguing that it has led to inadequate regulation due to a “revolving door” culture between companies and the regulator Ofwat.

Furthermore, she noted the stark difference in levels of investment, with Scotland seeing 35% more investment into their water infrastructure through its public water company compared to the English privately owned companies – equating to £72 per household more investment.

Image: Steve Forrest

At the fringe, authors of Clean Water, David Hall (pictured above) and Emanuele Lobina gave a detailed overview of the report from the historical context of privatisation of water in England through to its consequences and its solutions.

Mr Hall guided delegates through the research, comparing the UK’s performance against other countries whose water provision is publicly owned. He concluded that “the total contribution of the private owners of these companies over the years is to take out £85bn”, and citing the extraordinary figure that the dividends paid out by the companies are “equivalent to 69% of their pay bill on average.”

Mr Lobina then followed up by explaining the consequences for users, noting that that around 30% of households in the UK are in ‘water poverty’ which is where households spend more than 3% of their total expenditure on water.

He finished by examining ways in which the sector and government could solve the issues, chief among them was moving water back into public ownership.

The article WET conference examines failure of privatisation first appeared on the UNISON National site.